Arcturian Channel

HOME

December 13, 2003
Arcturian Channel – Part 1.
Q: Participant Question
A: Channeled Answer
Channel: I ask to be a channel for the highest light for the group
that's assembled here and for all those who may hear this recording.
Tonight is Saturday December 13, 2003, and we've just had a wonderful
opening, courtesy of the Pleiadians, of the Andromeda Gateway. I
request that we receive some more information on character of the
energetic infusion coming to Earth at this time. I also request that
we get a status report on the Extraterrestrial Assessment of the Jean
Ederman Message. What they have determined about prospects for their
appearance at this time. I ask that all the information received
tonight is for the highest good for all concerned. Thank you...
Please bring in any group that wishes to speak with us at this time.
A. We are here. We would like to congratulate you for assembling
tonight. We know the weather is not perfect; but it is perfect, in a
way. This cozy group represents the nucleus of the spirit of
humanity. You come from varied backgrounds and varied perspectives
and we value that. You come as braids in a rope. From different
sides, from different angles, coming together, intertwining, to make
a strong cord, a cord of intent. This process of braiding together
your lives strengthens you as a community. A braided rope is
stronger than a cable. The frictions between the braids actually make
the rope stronger. In the same way, the frictions between the tribes,
between the communities of humanity, make the whole stronger. When
these are braided together, the whole becomes stronger than any
linear system. This non-linear system is what we find most
interesting and most innovative about the Earth. This non-linear
system leads to non-linear and unpredictable effects.
We do not know what you can do, what you might become, what heights
you might rise to, what your achievements might be. We do know we
would like to be a part of that. We would like to assist. Ideally, we
could be a braid in the galactic rope together with you. Ideally, we
could forge a union that reaches out farther than the stars. It
reaches to other systems, other galaxies. Other systems beyond what
even we know. For we know there is a beyond, beyond our
comprehension. Today we begin a process, of integration, of
intertwining. A process of sharing perspectives, sharing our
questions, sharing our aspirations, and sharing our future. We are
excited by this, and we are open to your questions.
Channel: I think they want to... have this... I think they want to
have a more interactive session where they will take a question and
then talk for a little while and then take another question. So,
rather than this being a lecture, it's more like a question and
answer forum. Does anyone have a question, that's coming to their
mind?
Q. Yes I have three questions. .. But let me start off with the
Ederman message. What is the status in terms of the percentage of the
population that you're monitoring in terms of voting yes? How much of
the population are you monitoring who would be giving an answer? And
what would be the actual number that you are looking for, for an
actual showing up? So there are three questions there.
A. We found it difficult to devise a numeric figure to measure the
response. The response is multifaceted. Few have actually responded
in simple yes and no terms. However... numerically we would say
between 46 and 51 percent are affirmative. The negatives, however,
are not strong negatives, there is a spectrum of uncertainty. We are
currently looking at this spectrum to ascertain how the uncertainty
can be removed and clarity can be achieved. We congratulate you for
your work to this end. We ourselves are excited and appreciate this
process of working with humanity. We find it refreshing to have a
clear channel and open dialogue on this issue. We require a resonance
to be built with humanity before we can act. We require an invitation
in energetic terms, so the development of a general spirit of
appreciation for this interaction is what's important. It's the slide
we can slide down, to enter your system.
We do not wish to initiate contact from our, or for our, objectives.
But to initiate contact in response to a genuine call, in response to
a longing. That contact is a flower that grows out of the soil of the
Earth itself. Contact is an expression more of who you are than of
who we are. That is how we operate. To show you who you are. So, to
the degree that we can mirror for you the positive side of your
image, we count your response as something we can act upon. There
aren't a particular numeric set of rules or guidelines that we use.
We do use the clarity of the image of your planet opening and
welcoming the other. It's as if, in relationship, you long for
another. At the point that you are ready to embrace the other, that
other can appear in your life. Before that point, the other cannot
appear. Since we are the other, we wait for your signal; but it's an
energetic signal, not a vote as you know it. It's a choice that you
as representatives of your kind make. Obviously the more that make a
coherent choice, the more that come together to show gratitude, to
build the aspiration, the stronger our signal can be. The stronger
what we do can appear in your system. However know that we are
already here, we already love you and support you, in our own way.
Have confidence in that. Are your questions answered?
Q. Just the last bit about how much of the population would you
require to be in resonance with that image?
A. We recognize that only the very smallest fraction of humanity is
aware of our communication. We will make assumptions and estimations
of the mental state of the others. What we are interested in with
this initiative is the conscious participation of the few, the
conscious participation and assessment of those who do focus on the
message. So, actually, very few are required. It takes very few
individuals to change a system … what it requires is a clarity of
insight, clarity of expression, a clarity of intent. And when these
are in concert with the needs and aspirations of the whole, they echo
the whole, they articulate the whole, and the entire system can
develop along those lines. It's as if you are part of the circuit, a
circuit requires only a small wire to carry the signal, and the
signal itself can initiate a process much larger, the wire does not
do the work, the wire just carries the signal, so all we need is the
signal carried along a wire of your construction, of your choosing.
It could be only one person to send the signal. It matters not. But
the signal must be true to the heart of Gaia, the heart of the
planet, true to the Mother's wishes, and true to the Father's wishes.
If that is so, then the worlds move, and the worlds shift. Any other
questions?
Q. Yes, can you describe yourselves, more specifically … namely,
which planets and star systems you are from? And secondly, your
relationship to the Galactic Federation and to the original
consciousness, all that is and all that isn't?
A. We are the Arcturians, also Lyrans, some Tau Ceti, some Rigelians,
some Centaurians. We are a group, a small group, allied with the
Federation. We are not official representatives of the Federation. We
are, you might say, your brothers in spirit. We are pioneers in
consciousness, a relatively small group that wishes to create this
alignment, that wishes to create this call, with you. We are part of
All That Is, we are part of the becoming, part of the opening. We see
ourselves as you are beginning to see yourselves, as part of the
matrix, part of this vast universe, expressing itself, expressing
herself. Does that answer your question?
Q. Sure, can I ask one more question in connection to the Galactic
Federation? Can you give us some background information in terms of
how that organization is formed, its jurisdiction, and its powers?
A. It's a voluntary federation. It has no jurisdiction outside of its
membership. The members merely cooperate toward common goals. It does
not hold territory absent the natural grounds of the constituent
species. These natural grounds are each in alignment with their
planetary spheres, with their planetary consciousness. This provides
the "social contract", if you will, for their representation and for
their membership in the federation. We stick to planets that are free
to speak their own will. The planets that are free to express their
aspirations without restraint. In this way we have become a network,
a lacework, of star systems. We cooperate.
Is there anything else?
Q. To what extent is or shouldn't elites on this planet have an
agenda to depopulate the planet or substantial part? And what can we
do to prevent that agenda as something that exists, and to enhance
the ability of the less powerful and the least powerful amongst us to
live in peace with the rest of the planet?
A. This question is based on an illusion. The illusion of the
powerful and the powerless. We don't see it that way. We see each of
you as being quite powerful. Thank you very much. You are powerful
enough to create these dramas, to create these plays, these scripts,
in which some are abused, and some are the abusers, in which some are
wealthy and some are poor. This is your gift, to play out many
scripts, to play out many roles.
Within this context, it's only the planet who holds the stage on
which the play is done that is at issue. Only the planetary soul, the
planetary will, is at issue. The relationships between individuals
are for their benefit spiritually and psychologically; many need to
find expression in those ways. But what matters, if the play is to go
on, is that the stage be preserved; that the stage is set in a way
that allows further acts. Anything else?
Q. Is there an agenda to take away the stage?
A. Yes. Yes, there are those non-human forces who wish to end the
play. Who wish to draw down the curtain and move the cast to a new
venue, to an enclosed venue where the expression of the message has
no audience, where the play takes place merely for the actors, but
does not benefit an audience. Since we are members of the audience,
we wish to keep the playhouse open. We will actively work against
that scenario. But mind you, the issue is the stage and not the
actors. The issue is the possibility of the play and not the fortunes
of the individuals; and for this purpose, some members of the
audience may join the play. Some members of the audience may stand
up, walk forward and begin to interact. We've watched the play for so
long, we think we know the roles. We think we could do a good job.
Anything else?
Q. When you say that there is an agenda to close down the play, does
that mean, that there is .. is that agenda by the elites of humanity
or by off-planet forces?
A. It's a mixture. It's a mentality. Imagine if you will, that you
believe you are the owner of the playhouse, and the ticket prices
aren't to your satisfaction. In fact, many of the audience arrive and
enjoy the play for free. How would you feel? Perhaps you would feel
these wonderful spectacles should benefit you to a greater extend
than they do. And perhaps you disagree with the choices of the
scriptwriters. Perhaps the scriptwriters are beginning to pick topics
that you find uncomfortable. In this situation, you might be tempted
to change the rules, to subvert the production, to gain advantage for
yourself. This is what we see happening. It happens both within the
scene and behind the scenes.
Q. Do those who wish to close down the play wish to take the play off-
planet?
A. Yes, to a trailer park. [laughter]
Q. On another planet?
A. It's a closed system which is not open to inspection from others.
Physically, it could be a shield. Physically, it could be a shield
around the planet that does not permit inspection. In this way, the
admission price could be raised. That is, the audience would no
longer be free to come and enjoy the spectacle.
Q. When you say "to enjoy the spectacle" is that to say that the
purpose or one of the purposes of humanity, as we exist here, is to
be a spectacle?
A. You are the mythmakers. You make up the stories, you provide the
lessons, that all of us in the audience need to grow as a community:
to learn our past, to learn our future, to learn our own story. You
provide the artistry, the inspiration, for the rest of us. You also
provide us an excuse to come together and watch, [laughter] you
provide us some humor; we sometimes see ourselves in you. But
heretofore, the Earth has been an open system and we've enjoyed every
minute of the spectacle. We would be very sad if it were closed to
us. Especially, if it's not your choice to close it. There will be
representations that you have chosen to close yourselves off. We do
not think this is your true wish. Therefore, we have asked to come on
stage, we have asked to whisper to you quietly, and to find your true
heart. Do you want to be known?
Q. What's the best way for us to keep this an open show, and an open
stage? What's the best way for us to do that?
A. Comedies.
Q. Pardon?
A. Comedies.
Q. Comedies... do you mean we aren't funny enough yet? [laughter]
A. Political comedies have long been a process by which a discerning
group can communicate to those around them. And also subvert an
attempt at disruption. The more the oppressor behaves like the
comedians, the more ridiculous and less powerful they appear. So we
suggest a comedy, a political comedy, a satire, whose object is to
show how ridiculous the notion of oppression, the notion of
separation, really is in this universe. You are doing quite well in
this, actually. Those of you who play the role of oppressors
increasingly look farcical. Perhaps it would be good to point this
out.
Q. And the best media for pointing this out are, what?
A. Every media works, any expressive vehicle of communication works.
A common ground is lightheartedness in the face of oppression.
Showing the human spirit instead of despair; happiness and laughter
instead of anger. These are the keys to embarrassing and
disempowering the enemy. Make them look silly to their friends. And
they may laugh along with you. Any other questions?
Q. Recently, I heard that one of the best ways to introduce the
concept of ETs to humans .. is by having a benevolent appearance, not
so much on Earth, but just far enough away so we can have a sighting
and someone can notice something different going on in the universe.
Is that possible? To do something like that? Or are we still not
open to that idea or would the information even be suppressed?
A. We are not completely clear about what you mean. Every year more
and more is discovered about the universe. As humanity's awareness
and vibration increases, more mysteries appear. At one time, six
planets were known. Now many more. Planets around other stars are
known. These are related to the expansion of awareness, and the
increase in the technological level. But many mysteries remain, even
with what is visible so far. Perhaps you can give an example of what
you mean.
Q. Actually, more specifically, I wondering about us acknowledging
that there is life on other planets or life outside of this earth. We
still don't have... the general population still doesn't have that in
their belief system.
A. Yes.
Q. So is it possible for us to see that there is life on another
planet?
A. A remote view of life would have an effect, but not the effect
that we wish. A remote view of life is, in essence, a falsification.
There's life all around you . It's just not under the lamppost. Life
is not far away, it's not where you are looking. The real lesson is
that you are surrounded by life, that you are a part of a larger
system. Seeing some evidence of life in your physical system would
have an effect, but mainly with intellectuals. It wouldn't actually
touch the lives of the masses. It would create discussion and instant
forgetfulness. What we wish, is to validate the inner knowing of many
people, to validate the ancient wisdom, to bring into the Now your
heritage, that which you once knew, that which you've forgotten. And
so for this, we must work differently. We must work to allow the
memory to surface. We must work to reduce the fear that that memory
triggers. To reduce the hesitation inherent in the memory, in the
knowledge. To improve the confidence of those who must now stand with
others. Of those who have been alone for so long. Do you agree?
Q. Uh hum.. So my question is, what have we forgotten?
A. You have forgotten your heritage. You have forgotten your parents,
you have forgotten your family. The brother and sister planets who
grew up with you. This is by design. We wanted to know what the
system would create, left alone for a while. We did not intend to
leave you alone for so long. But there have been things that we
wanted to find out by watching you remotely, by watching you from
afar, by sending our love without speaking our heart. We wanted to
know what you might become just by dancing with each other. We seeded
you with every possible potential. And we wanted to know what would
grow in that garden. That garden with so many seeds. So we watered
you and we tended you, but only lightly. We wanted to know what would
happen if you were left alone for a while.
Q. And you've discovered?
A. We discovered that you are much stronger than we expected. We
discovered that you are a luxuriant garden of many many facets.
Rather than a single vine, a single species, dominating the others,
you managed to come through with many varieties, with many colors.
With many many perspectives. We believe this is a rich heritage that
you can draw on, going forward. You've done well.
Q. When you say "we", I guess I'm trying to understand "we made this
decision". Who is `we'?
A. Your brothers and sisters on other planets. Those who seeded your
races. Those who provided the biological, chemical and geological
material for your system. Those who provided the information
necessary to get you up and going. Those are your relations, as we
see them.
Are there other questions?
Q. I want to know about what appears puzzling... On the one hand, the
Ederman message suggests that there is some urgency in ETs showing up
to prevent something like a frequency fence being constructed or some
alternative contact scenario from occurring which would limit us in
some way. Suggesting there is some urgency whereby we become trapped.
But then, a lot of other literature from the lightworker community is
saying that we are absorbing and integrating higher dimensional
energies at an increasing rate and that the prospects are looking
very very positive for us. So can you comment on what appears to be
this contrast, one suggesting there is an immediate crisis where we
have to be wary of losing our freedom, whereas the other perspective
is much more optimistic?
A. Both processes are under way. We can't tell you what will happen,
because we don't know. It depends on who you talk to. Some perceive
the infusion of energy and can't imagine a systemic collapse. Others
look at current conditions and can't imagine a systemic shift. We
don't know.
Q. I have a question ah… it's a follow up question. You mention in
the message that humanity is being enslaved by the use of advanced
technologies. Can you give us a specific example of the technology
you are talking about and its effects on the ecosystem and humanity
as a whole? More specifically, different dimensions of life.
A. One such technology you know as "television". Think of what
television does. It isolates the physical being, settles them into
their chair, fixates their gaze and turns them into what, for all
intents and purposes, is a robot. It entraps the mind in moving
images that are standardized and projected from a single source. This
is not the natural way for the human mind to function. The human mind
is designed to function in an environment constantly changing and
reflecting local conditions. Reflecting the creative potentials
relevant to that perspective. Television is a thread which
standardizes the input, and so standardizes the output. This is mind
control.
Q. You also mentioned centralized powers in your message, can you
give specific people or groups who you would consider centralized
powers that's currently behind the statement of humanity? [Ederman
Message].
A. Look around and ask yourself if the people you see are acting
freely. If they are acting freely, they are not enslaved. If they are
acting under compulsions then we might use that term. We might also
say, it is a choice. But a habit, or an addiction, has less and less
an element of choice. The freest choices are equal... are sourced in
a desire, in an aspiration, for something new. A controlled choice is
one where there are great consequences one way or the other. If the
dice are loaded, it's less and less possible to win the game. So
rather than terms such as `enslavement', we would say that you are
playing with loaded dice and the dice are getting heavier on one or
two sides. So that it makes it difficult for you to win against the
house.
Q. Can you give any specific groups that you would consider a
centralized power? … Any economic groups?
A. All groups in the role of the systems makers: those who set up the
terms under which you must play, have an element of this control.
Have the element of exploitation, an element of profit from your
choices, from your investment in their games. It's a systemic issue
for individuals on Earth. In some sense, it's an appropriate issue
for you to explore. It is part of our universe to have such
monstrosities, such systems, and we do want to know how they arise
and how they evaporate. So, for this, we thank you for exploring them.
Q. Is there such a thing as free energy, and if so, how would you
guys be willing to aid humanity in terms of free energy device?
A. There is an abundance of energy. It's free if you are not paying
for it. It's a question of tapping the source. It's a question of
technology, a question of knowledge, but it's also a question of
permission, of allowance. Every social group evolves, and, as it
evolves, it chooses new appropriate, forms of technology to express
itself. We see you on the verge of adapting to these new
technologies. Whether you'll be permitted to make widespread use of
them is another question. So the question of free energy is not just
its invention, it's not just a technical question, but it's a social
question. To what ends will such energy be put? You can easily
imagine advanced technical devices staying in the hands of the few,
and empowering their positions, rather than being widely distributed
and empowering the mass. And, for this reason, we must be careful to
introduce advanced technology carefully and appropriately. In any
case, we would not wish to insert a technology that had not been
chosen freely and appropriately by the spirit of humanity itself.
It's as if the play were suddenly... suddenly had a new prop. The
free energy prop may disrupt some of the movements of the actors; in
any case, it would change the scene, and might change the message. So
think about how the message that you want to send, the message of who
you are, can be affected if that prop were on stage. Think of how
you might use that prop and script for yourself a scene in which you
use it to express your highest aspiration. And then, when you need
it, it will be there, in that role. If you think of it just in terms
of technology, you may find yourself at the effect of a different
scriptwriter; one that uses that same prop, but uses it to send a
message that is not to your liking. Any other questions?
Q. Just to summarize, are you basically saying that there is such a
thing as free energy, but we are just not spiritually evolved enough
at this point to successfully incorporate it into our societies?
A. Free energy is a general term. It means different things to
different people. Each investigator has a different concept of what
they want to create. Certainly there is abundant energy in the
universe. There are abundant ways of converting one form of physical
reality to another form. You know already about mass and energy.
Well, there are other conversions, in which energy can come and go.
If that's what you mean by free energy, then yes, these forms exist,
these conversions exist. However, you may also mean energy that costs
nothing for the inhabitants of Earth. This is a different matter, a
political matter, an economic matter.
Q. Does that latter sort of energy exist, that costs nothing, or just
the types that you mentioned … conversion process type?
A. The cost of energy is a question that is determined by a social
mechanism, one that involves balancing a myriad of interests. This is
the sort of thing that scriptwriters determine. The sort of thing
that you determine by your choices. A market mechanism demonstrates,
to a greatest common degree, the choices of numerous individuals.
Market pricing of energy would reflect that choice. Of course,
markets can be manipulated by those who control access to technology
and access to information. So if you are convinced, through your
television, for example, that energy cannot be free, then energy
cannot be free. Even if the wind blows and the sun shines, you will
be convinced that energy cannot be free.
Q. Thanks, anyone else?
Q. It's my understanding that Gaia's ascending and that we...
basically as humans... will ascend with her. Is that your
understanding as well?
A. Yes.
Q. And is that process happening now?
A. Yes.
Q. And the November 8, Harmonic Concordance was that a big shift of
energy, that is moving us in a very positive direction?
A. Yes. We would say "excellent, well done".
Q. And, some of my reading indicates that the lightworkers on the
planet have been doing very well and they have created the energy
that supports a higher dimension grid, to which we will move to
eventually, and that's part of the ascension program. And that … is
that your understanding as well?
A. Yes, the grids are multidimensional. They interlace with the
physical structure of the earth by reflection. The earth is a
reflection of the angles, if you will, of the grid work. As the
lightworkers use their process, use their techniques, use their minds
and their hearts, they imagine a new gridwork, a new skeleton, of the
building. Think of a skyscraper, the iron girders going up. These
form a skeleton on which the rest of the building can be constructed.
So the gridwork forms a skeleton along which physical reality can
take place. This is all work that happens at the same time that
physical reality evolves, so it sets the stage for new construction.
Is that clear?
Q. Yes. And ah, … is the structure of this new gridwork is for us
to.. is the gridwork for a higher dimension? Is that correct?
A. There are always already interpenetrating dimensions. What's new
is the cooperation of beings within the system in setting it up. You
already have a gridwork; your system already exists along these
lines. What's new is the formation of the stage for the next act from
within the play.
Q. And it's also my understanding that the forces off-planet and on-
planet that have been creating a more dampening network on the earth,
to keep us from ascending to a higher dimension; that those efforts
have fallen behind, and that the efforts of the lightworkers have
moved far enough along that the forces, the dampening forces, don't
have a chance of keeping a dampening network on the Earth?
A. To a large extent they are not aware of what you are doing. Their
efforts are designed to disrupt the furniture at the end of the act,
Act 1. Your efforts are designed to set a stage for Act 2. At a
certain point, Act 1 will come to an end, and Act 2 will begin. We
foresee that they will be unprepared for Act 2, and having disrupted
Act 1, they'll find that the continuance of that Act, which they felt
would culminate in their control of the scene, is irrelevant. So we
congratulate you for creating this other option, this other play,
this other stage, for you to continue. Is that clear?
Q. Yes.
Q. This weekend there is going to be a number of aircraft over the
air in Washington DC, supposedly mostly F16 fighters. To what
extent, if at all, will there be a mixture of non-terrestrial craft
in the air over Washington and around Washington this weekend.
A. Invisibly, there may be some who come by, but not to make a great
show.
Q. I had another question. For Act 2 to begin, do we need… as we
sometimes describe it, for ETs to come to the Earth to assist us? Or
is this something that we can do on our own, from within, with the
human spirit.
A. A number things are required to get a new Act going. Actors must
learn their lines, prop makers must do their work, set designers must
have their chance. All aspects of the work proceed in concert, with
an opening day in mind. The rehearsals, the experimentations, all of
these things happen before opening day. So when does the Second Act
begin? Does it begin at the first conception of the concept of the
possibility, or does it begin only when the lines are known, when
everyone is ready, and the audience is present, and the curtain goes
up? We feel that Act 2 is already underway, because the preparations
are being made. In many ways, this is the interesting time, before
the curtain opens. Once the curtain opens, the expression becomes
public, but it's been refined, and it's been worked on, and it's been
learned, well before opening night.
Q. I have a question. It concerns the phenomenon of human
mutilations, people found mutilated in ways that suggest an
extraterrestrial involvement. Do you have any information you can
give on what ET groups may be involved in this, and also what the
agenda is?
A. The agenda is one of domination, and that might tell you who is
behind it. We think it's been unsuccessful. The information regarding
these is not widespread. Therefore it has had little impact on the
wider public. This is not to say they won't keep trying. But to the
rest of us, they are only showing a weak hand. Eventually, they'll
figure that out, and it will stop.
Q. Would it be worthwhile for me to try to bring some light to this
phenomenon, or is better to just let it go and follow it's own path?
A. The best strategy is to gain confidence. If you are talking to
someone who needs to know, this is appropriate for them to know, that
they will not be disrupted by these activities. If someone who would
find this sort of event dispiriting, it may not be the best choice to
inform them. It all depends on who you are talking to. Someone who
will be invigorated and empowered by the information, or someone who
will be shut down and disempowered by the information. We cannot
really advise you on this. We suggest you be careful of the venues
and use this information to further the overall goal of liberation,
the overall goal.
[End of Part 1]

Links:
Qala Serenia Phoenix "Process for Release from the World Net"
http://www.g-a-i-a.com/gaia/pages/mm04.php
Jean Ederman's "Change the World! Decide Whether We Should Show Up"
http://www.geocities.com/changetheworld_now/Changetheworld1.htm
"We Are Ready to Change the World" Online Petition
http://www.petitiononline.com/readynow/petition.html